In an upcoming documentary about the legacy of Dick Cheney, Foreign Policy notes the former vice president lashes out at Condoleezza Rice for overriding his recommendation to bomb a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007.
Said Cheney: "I thought [destroying the reactor] would reassert the kind of authority and influence we had back in '03 when we took down Saddam Hussein and eliminated Iraq as a potential source of WMD. Condi was on the wrong side of all those issues so we had significant issues."
"In his 2011 memoir In My Time, Cheney called the former diplomat 'naive' for her attempts to negotiate with North Korea and said she once 'tearfully admitted' her mistakes to him in his office." _____________ Well, I guess that's the end of her as a candidate for Prez or even Veep.
What happened to your prediction that Obama would lose the election because the gay marriage issue would cost him the votes of conservative Christian blacks?
BLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPPPPPPPP!!!
WRONG WRONG WRONG _______________ Appears blacks have some understanding of what it means to gays to be rejected, eh? Second class citizenship just doesn't sit well with anyone.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: "I am saying that everybody is going to have to do something, and the one key to this whole thing is trying to make sure we keep in mind who we are here for. We're not here for ourselves, we're not here for our parties. We're not here to advance our electoral prospects. We're here for American families who have been getting battered pretty good over the last four years, are just starting to see the economy improved. Businesses are just starting to see some confidence coming back, and this is not a win for anybody. This is a loss for the American people."
EVEN BETTER WHEN YOU SEE IT http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/01/obama_american_families_have_been_getting_battered_pretty_good_over_the_last_four_years.html
"We're not here for ourselves, we're not here for our parties. We're not here to advance our electoral prospects. We're here for American families"
What a load of crap.
He loads every working family with tax increases, astronomical heating bills, astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE, runs around the country lyin' his ass off - and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
He loads every working family with tax increases, astronomical heating bills, astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE, runs around the country lyin' his ass off - and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
The sycophant doesn't care what his actions are only his flowery prose
Let's look into the twit's wild-eyed accusation, shall we?
1: He loads every working family with tax increases.
Truth, the CONGRESS passed the law that repealed the witholding tax reduction.
2: astronomical heating bills, Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
3: astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE, Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
4: runs around the country lyin' his ass off - Be specific. Prove he is lying, with facts, figures, verifiable information. You can't because that's far above your ability, but you should at least try if you are going to make such accusations. Your ODS is not specific enough.
and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
And do you really believe he wants to damage, intentionally damage families? Really? Based on what? ODS?
Provide something that contains something called facts, not just your emotions and "feelings".
Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
Have you seen the economic numbers from the EU, China?
It's the fiat being printed.
You don't know shit about economics stop, while you're behind
So let’s do the math with the sequestration cuts. $44 billion equals one eightieth of the federal budget. A Big Mac extra value meal contains 1,320 calories. One eightieth of 1,320 is 16.5 calories. An average McDonald’s french fry has 6.5 calories. So now the arithmetic is simple: if we were to cut the equivalent of the sequestration dollars out of a Big Mac Extra Value Meal, we would eliminate 2 1/2 french fries.
So: we order a Big Mac Extra Value Meal, and we eat the Big Mac. We drink the medium Coke. We eat 84 out of 87 french fries. We take the 85th french fry and eat half of it. We place the other half back in the bag, along with two more uneaten french fries. And that is the “diet” that equals the sequestration cuts. Suffice it to say that we have a very long way to go before we have to start worrying about spending cuts being too deep.
The average price for one gallon of unleaded gasoline has increased nearly every month since Barack Obama was inaugurated in January 2009. At that time, when George W. Bush was leaving office, the price was $1.78 per gallon. Today, three years and one month later, the average price is $3.64. - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gas-when-bush-left-office-178-gas-today-364-highest-average-price-calif-420#sthash.fXwxbBvx.dpuf
GAS PRICES WERE $4.21 A GALLON UNDER BUSH - SO WHY IS OBAMA TO BLAME FOR GAS PRICES TODAY? The hypocrisy of the Conservatives never fails to amaze me and the hypocrisy of blaming President Obama for rising gas prices is no exception!
Gas price under bush went to $4.21 a gallon and was over $3.00 a gallon most of his last term in office.
The only reason gas was at $1.85 when President Obama took office is because of the economic crash which greatly reduced demand and the crash effected all countries not just the US.
Gas prices rise with demand and as the economy has improved it is completely normal for gas prices to increase as more businesses use fuel for deliveries, more trucks on the road, more people traveling, and more people driving to work.
So our rising gas price is actually an indicator that the economy is recovering.
We also see a spike when the Libya UN action happened and now with Iran and Israel in a standoff an Syria effecting the region we are seeing another spike as speculators are betting on a war.
Anyone that tries to blame president Obama for higher gas prices is a fool and drilling more oil would not lower the price because we do not have a shortage and oil drilling has quadrupled in the last 4 years and the US is now a net exporter of oil.
So ignore the talking heads and fear monger Conservatives and complain all you want about higher gas prices but don't blame President Obama!
The only reason gas was at $1.85 when President Obama took office is because of the economic crash which greatly reduced demand and the crash effected all countries not just the US.
Idiot we had .1% growth in the economy that explains a doubling of gas prices?
I have seen the news out of Europe. Great Britain is headed into a double dip because of austerity.
You arrogant prick. When the stupid farmer is bloviating you never call his bs out, now do you?
And you admitted you took only required economic classes and you do what now? Oh yeah. Sell insurance. Oh boy.
Look, one does not have to be as edumacated as you and the farmer to understand the basics of economics. It was a long time ago, far far away, but because I find the subject interesting, I took the AP economic classes in my junior and senior years of HS. I haven't forgotten all of it, not by a long shot.
But I DO understand the basics, and despite your desperate need to blame Obama for fuel prices, that does not stand up to even the most basic economic theory. And you damn well know it. And if you don't.. then you are dumber than you look when you make such claims.
They are coming to get you Paul! http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/41687_Sarah_Palin-_The_Government_Is_Stockpiling_Ammo_to_Use_Against_US_Citizens
What drives it is world wide demand. That is a big part of it. But the major cause at this time are the large number of maintenance shut downs. By what appears to be a coincidence, quite a few of them are down now.
And what you ignore is just how much domestic production has increased in the last four years. And it only looks like that is likely to increase over the next twenty years.
Oh, and by the way once the Keystone XL pipeline is approved it will be renamed the Obama Pipeline.
Obama’s remarks continue the administration’s pattern of overstating the potential impact of the sequester, which we have explored this week. But this error is particularly bad--and nerve-wracking to the janitors and security guards who were misled by the president’s comments. We originally thought this was maybe a Two Pinocchio rating, but in light of the AOC memo and the confirmation that security guards will not face a pay cut, nothing in Obama’s statement came close to being correct. Four Pinocchios
That from the Obama-friendly Washington Post. It is just one of his many lies that can be easily proven.
BTW doughboy that's more proof than you have ever showed when you accuse anyone of lying.
"BTW doughboy that's more proof than you have ever showed when you accuse anyone of lying."
HB's as big a pathological liar as Obama - AND a total psycho, like Obama.
He's back to posting Nutting's lies...for about the fifth or sixth time.
Three Pinocchios
" UPDATE: The Associated Press also dug into the numbers and came to the same conclusion as we did. “The problem with that rosy claim is that the Wall Street bailout is part of the calculation. The bailout ballooned the 2009 budget just before Obama took office, making Obama’s 2010 results look smaller in comparison. And as almost $150 billion of the bailout was paid back during Obama’s watch, the [Nutting] analysis counted them as government spending cuts,” the AP said. “It also assumes Obama had less of a role setting the budget for 2009 than he really did.”"
Paul, you made the accusation that said Obama was at fault for the high gasoline prices. I asked for proof. Not an op ed piece. But alas, my hand held device acted up and I lost that post. But the question remains. Specifically, why is the President at fault for the cost of gasoline, a market driven cost. But what ever clear liquid was involved left you unable to provide a coherent response at 2:30 AM your time.
I can't imagine how you feel at this moment but it can't be good. LOL
As to you worthless dipshits, just keep believing you are winning this political battle and nothing has to change. That kind of thinking has lost you five of the last six Presidential election popular votes. And that is unlikely to change if you persist in continuing your childish "LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE" attacks. Most people, being more rational than you, dismiss this correctly, as the raving of unbalanced lunatics
Could it be that OBama promises on lower health care cost on private policies never happened, or that CA taxes will take another 15 k from his "ton" of money home sale and that Obama's new taxes will take again that much and more. Or is he upset that the unemployment rate is not where Obama promised it would be or the GNP or wages.
James looking at the data only 8 months out of "w" last four year term where fuel prices over 3 dollars a gallon in Kansas.
Good to hear your fuel price is only 3.17 yesterday, please do post the address of that station so I can verify your claim.
Thanks
By year average price in USA 2000 thru 2010 1.484 1.420 1.345 1.561 1.852 2.270 2.572 2.796 3.246 2.353 http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epmr_pte_nus_dpg&f=a
Oh, Obama is going to gin up a story, take the house and use it to intentionally destroy the nation!
That is totally rational. The only reason most of the country finds that kind of thinking irrational, is the One has deluded them. I see it now Ette! You have looked past the smoke and mirrors to see the evil behind the affable mask. The nation will forever be in debt to you for saving them from themselves!
Oh my. You guys have got it all figured out. You better stock up on weapons and ammunition. Or the nearest FEMA camp will be your home for the next four years at least! Did you see how much ammunition they brought to get ready for this?
The World Net Daily has been documenting this!
And remain true to the troother motto:
"It isn't paranoia if they really are out to get you! "
make sure you click on the annual button and you will see how wrong James is on the facts.
Moving ahead the Keystone Pipeline will finally be approved by John Kerry and Obama and millions of dollars will flood over the Canadian boarder and into the USA.
Petro Jobs are accounting for more and more jobs , where are the green energy pixy dust jobs?
A must listen. CA has some really bright people , we must listen to them.
Unemployment benefits are creating jobs faster than practically any other program, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday.
Talking to reporters, the House speaker was defending a jobless benefits extension against those who say it gives recipients little incentive to work. By her reasoning, those checks are helping give somebody a job.
"It injects demand into the economy," Pelosi said, arguing that when families have money to spend it keeps the economy churning. "It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name."
Pelosi said the aid has the "double benefit" of helping those who lost their jobs and acting as a "job creator" on the side.
Maxine Waters wants to Socialize the Oil Companies.
"Only Lisa would have been around to make that claim. That was before this alter ego showed up."
Trust me, I wish I was in my 40's like her.
Funny how you seem to remember someone from 7 years ago, but she has no idea who you are - could it be that you're the lisa lisa slut troll?
BTW, idiot -
It WASN'T BEFORE THIS BLOG...
"WEDNESDAY, JUL 9, 2008 05:59 AM CDT
Suing George W. Bush: A bizarre and troubling tale U.S. officials went to extremes to stifle our legal challenge to Bush's warrantless surveillance -- but a federal judge says the program is criminal, anyway."
It is not without a bit of irony that, in the 40 years since the explosion of the Watergate story, Bob Woodward would again be under attack from the White House for trying to tell the truth. But this time the attack is coming from a Democrat.
While Barack Obama may not share the Nixon pedigree, he and his White House are the closest thing to the Nixon regime of any that we have seen since then -- both in the extent of their paranoia and their willingness to suppress the truth and push the boundaries of law.
In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness.
Ette, the left here is not about to admit they are wrong.
The Promises of lower health care insurance cost, lower unemployment, and lower by half yearly deficits and higher incomes are just four that he failed on in his first term.
Now for this term, ObamaTax is collecting money, I know what is being done with those new billions, it is helping to hide the true spending of Obama.
One of us conservatives posted a piece showing the influx of billions of dollars to the US Treasury from TARP, Obama uses those billions to lower the next rise in deficit.
One more point, I give credit for James pointed us to a link where this President spoke in a Saturday chat of "lowering Debt" . It would be nice IF all of those economic wizards Mr Obama has hired could find a way to put out a Budget.
With a Budget the President gets to show us his numbers, his priorities and his plan to get to his promised National Debt reduction in just under four years.
Remember that quaint ideal of a President leading.
"In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness."
Ditto
Pat Caddell - a dying breed. The lunatics are running the democrat party.
FROM THE WEEKLY ADDRESS: A majority of the American people agree with me on this approach – including a majority of Republicans. We just need Republicans in Congress to catch up with their own party and the rest of the country.
Another lie from the psychotic pathological liar...
"The Pinocchio Test
Obama’s remarks continue the administration’s pattern of overstating the potential impact of the sequester, which we have explored this week. But this error is particularly bad--and nerve-wracking to the janitors and security guards who were misled by the president’s comments.
We originally thought this was maybe a Two Pinocchio rating, but in light of the AOC memo and the confirmation that security guards will not face a pay cut, nothing in Obama’s statement came close to being correct.
FOUR COUNT 'EM FOUR
"Sequester spin: Obama’s false claim of Capitol janitors receiving ‘a pay cut’
Dear AOC Employees,
Sequestration takes effect today and the AOC’s current funding for Fiscal Year 2013 will bereduced by approximately 5.3%. While this reduction in funding will be difficult for us to absorb,the good news is the AOC has taken proactive steps to slow spending and plan for the cuts sincelast October. As I mentioned in my note to you last week, our planning and preparations will allowus to implement changes more slowly, reducing the impact of Sequestration on our customersand AOC employees.
At this time, we will begin implementing the AOC’s Sequestration plan. The top priorities in theplan are maintaining critical support for Congress and the Supreme Court and supporting AOCemployees. We will focus our efforts first on the following:
•Reducing or eliminating certain contracts •Postponing some repair and alteration projects •Trimming maintenance and operations programs •Reducing bench stock and supply levels •Delaying replacement of old equipment •Further reducing overtime, training, and awards •Limiting new hiring
We do not anticipate furloughs for AOC employees as a result of Sequestration. However, we willnot know the AOC’s final budget for this year until Congress passes legislation to replace theexisting continuing resolution, which expires March 27. If that legislation further reduces our budget, we may have to consider additional spending reductions, which could include furloughs.We will utilize furloughs, if necessary, only as a way to avoid more harmful actions such as aReduction in Force.
In the coming weeks, you will hear more news as we begin to implement different actions in our Sequestration plan. Additionally, I will provide another update once we learn more about our finalfunding level for the rest of Fiscal Year 2013. To stay informed, I encourage you to subscribetoday to receive AOC news and announcements to your personal email address or phone -subscribe today.
It is important that we continue to work together as one team to overcome the challenges createdby these funding cuts and achieve our critical mission. I truly appreciate how hard you work everyday to care for our customers.
Thank you, Stephen T. Ayers, FAIA, LEED AP Architect of the Capitol"
When we have a statesman for a President, he says things like this: ___________ I know there are Republicans in Congress who would actually rather see tax loopholes closed than let these cuts go through. And I know there are Democrats who’d rather do smart entitlement reform than let these cuts go through. There’s a caucus of common sense. And I’m going to keep reaching out to them to fix this for good.
Because the American people are weary of perpetual partisanship and brinksmanship. This is America, and in America, we don’t careen from one manufactured crisis to another. We make smart choices. We plan. We prioritize. So I’m going to push through this paralysis and keep fighting for the real challenges facing middle-class families. I’m going to keep pushing for high-quality preschool for every family that wants it, and make sure the minimum wage becomes a wage you can live on. I’m going to keep pushing to fix our immigration system, repair our transportation system, and keep our children safe from gun violence.
That’s the work you elected me to do. That’s what I’m focused on every single day. Thanks. ______________ Cue the stupid "man juice" comments.
"Because the American people are weary of perpetual partisanship and brinksmanship. This is America, and in America, we don’t careen from one manufactured crisis to another."
That was before the pathological liar was crowned King.
My only detailed contribution on this topic was the article I posted at 10:58PM. If there was something wrong there, it was the article that was at error.
"James said... Inquiring minded James said... KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?"
less than half as much in 8 years as in skeets 0linsky's first 4.
but i know that if skeets really tries hard he can get us to $50 TRILLION before his regime slinks back to cabrini green.
Changing the subject: From the brilliant press conference yesterday: ____________ Christi Parsons. Q Thank you. THE PRESIDENT: Hey, Christi. Q Mr. President, your administration weighed in yesterday on the Proposition 8 case. A few months ago it looked like you might be averse to doing that, and I just wondered if you could talk a little bit about your deliberations and how your thinking evolved on that. Were there conversations that were important to you? Were there things that you read that influenced your thinking?
THE PRESIDENT: As everybody here knows, last year, upon a long period of reflection, I concluded that we cannot discriminate against same-sex couples when it comes to marriage; that the basic principle that America is founded on -- the idea that we're all created equal -- applies to everybody, regardless of sexual orientation, as well as race or gender or religion or ethnicity.
And I think that the same evolution that I've gone through is an evolution that the country as a whole has gone through. And I think it is a profoundly positive thing. So that when the Supreme Court essentially called the question by taking this case about California's law, I didn’t feel like that was something that this administration could avoid. I felt it was important for us to articulate what I believe and what this administration stands for.
And although I do think that we're seeing, on a state-by-state basis, progress being made -- more and more states recognizing same-sex couples and giving them the opportunity to marry and maintain all the benefits of marriage that heterosexual couples do -- when the Supreme Court asks, do you think that the California law, which doesn't provide any rationale for discriminating against same-sex couples other than just the notion that, well, they're same-sex couples, if the Supreme Court asks me or my Attorney General or Solicitor General, do we think that meets constitutional muster, I felt it was important for us to answer that question honestly -- and the answer is no.
Q And given the fact that you do hold that position about gay marriage, I wonder if you thought about just -- once you made the decision to weigh in, why not just argue that marriage is a right that should be available to all people of this country?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, that's an argument that I’ve made personally. The Solicitor General in his institutional role going before the Supreme Court is obliged to answer the specific question before them. And the specific question presented before the Court right now is whether Prop 8 and the California law is unconstitutional.
And what we’ve done is we’ve put forward a basic principle, which is -- which applies to all equal protection cases. Whenever a particular group is being discriminated against, the Court asks the question, what’s the rationale for this -- and it better be a good reason. And if you don't have a good reason, we’re going to strike it down.
And what we’ve said is, is that same-sex couples are a group, a class that deserves heightened scrutiny, that the Supreme Court needs to ask the state why it’s doing it. And if the state doesn't have a good reason, it should be struck down. That's the core principle as applied to this case.
Now, the Court may decide that if it doesn't apply in this case, it probably can't apply in any case. There’s no good reason for it. If I were on the Court, that would probably be the view that I’d put forward. But I’m not a judge, I’m the President. So the basic principle, though, is let’s treat everybody fairly and let’s treat everybody equally. And I think that the brief that's been presented accurately reflects our views. _______________________ Hey, TROOTHERS. and especially Savage and Commensa, tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this. Quote him where he is wrong and tell us why he is wrong. Thank you. We all await your answers.
A Texas public school employee was accidentally shot and wounded during a district-sponsored handgun safety class. According to local news sources KLTV and the Tyler Morning Telegraph, maintenance worker Glenn Geddie was accidentally shot after a training session aimed toward arming employees.
A statement from the district superintendent read:
At the conclusion of the CHL training on February 27, 2013, one certified person stayed for private instruction with the instructor and had a mechanical malfunction with his weapon. With the assistance of the instructor, the malfunction was addressed, but the gun misfired and the bullet ricocheted coming back to strike the VISD employee in the left leg. The VISD employee was attended to at the scene and transferred to Tyler for further treatment. The injury is not life threatening or disabling. Because of privacy and security issues we cannot make any further statement.
The accident will not affect the district’s decision, in light of the Sandy Hook massacre and other school shootings, to arm employees. Since the Connecticut shooting, a number of school districts nationwide have moved to arm teachers and school employees either by pushing for a legislation shifts on concealed weapons in schools, or, as in one Michigan township, by training school employees as volunteer reserve police officers, enabling them to carry concealed arms
especially Savage and Commensa, tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this. Quote him where he is wrong and tell us why he is wrong. Thank you. We all await your answers."
Been away for 10 days and I see the quality of their arguments remains the same, bottom of the barrel......LOL
Twit, as usual you save all your anger for Obama and give Republicans a pass.
I thought Obama was playing politics with same sex marriage. But it's also possible he did wrestle with the idea. Neither one of us knows for sure.
But consider this. Romney himself has now come out in favor and several members of his campaign staff have signed amicus briefs in support of the case that is in front of the SCOTUS on California's Proposition 8. But they waited until the election was over to avoid insulting bigots like Machine Gun Mensa. But you are PISSED at Obama.
The Republicans, well, in your mind they were just doing what they had to do.
Obama described the country's energy picture in 2008, when gas prices were closing in on $4 a gallon. Then, it was a clear sign of "Washington's failure to lead on energy," which was "turning the middle-class squeeze into a devastating vise-grip for millions of Americans."
"For the well-off in this country," Obama said in May 2008, "high gas prices are mostly an annoyance, but to most Americans they're a huge problem, bordering on a crisis."
In 2013 we are bordering upon a crisis, right Mr Obama.
August 2008 Obama declared rising energy costs to be "one of the most dangerous and urgent threats this nation has ever faced" and that gas prices "are wiping out paychecks and straining businesses."
Today, it is a sign of economic growth and honey flowing in the streets again.
Never mind historic drop in disposable income to low and middle income earners.
The United States will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading oil producer by about 2017 and will become a net oil exporter by 2030, the International Energy Agency said Monday.
Keystone Pipeline how long before Liberals get behind Obama's bold move to approve it after his re-election?
“There was a specific mention in the news today by a high ranking official that said ‘The employees that clean and maintain the US Capitol will receive a cut in pay’ (not a specific quote but close to it). This is NOT true. Therefore, I request that you please notify all our employees about the importance of ignoring media reports.”
Syndicated columnist George Will made a statement on the Laura Ingraham Radio Show Friday that should make people on both sides of the aisle and both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue take notice.
"I think the President has at long last so gone over the top in his rhetoric that he’s even losing the mainstream media" .
Will is right about Obama going over the top. But I think he's wrong when he said Obama is losing the main stream media. They have too much invested in him.
hb shows the troothers as what they are. Partisan Hypocrites with no class.
said...
There seems to be something you twits can't understand. Obama is a politician. And yes, even the Plastic Jesus as you call him, does things for political reasons. I can't think of any President in my lifetime who did not do the same thing.
So yes, he does and says things that are self-serving. BFD. What he hasn't done, that his immediate predecessor did. It is well documented that the Bush administration created a false rationale to get public support for the invasion of Iraq. Over 4,000 Americans, and 100,000 Iraqis are dead because of this deception.
And you get pissed over hedging support over gay marriage.
There is absolutely no comparison between the two acts. Not one bit. But you stupid fuckers are freaked out over this yet still hold Bush and Cheney in high regard. Because they have an (R) after their names. And for NO other reason.
For that reason alone, I don't have one ounce of respect for you. Not one.
Oh really Paul? Do you expect me to believe that? Let's say the news came out that the President knew exactly where a known terrorist was located. One deeply involved in active operations against the United States or her allies. But Obumble as you would be calling him, based on a legal technicality, that being he is an American citizen, refused to take him out and because of that Americans died in a terrorist attack.
You would be calling for his impeachment, as would most Republicans and perhaps even some Democrats. And you know it.
So don't try to bullshit a bullshitter. I know better.
You would be calling for his impeachment, as would most Republicans and perhaps even some Democrats. And you know it.
Fat man like it or not i have always delineated between Padilla, the panty bomber or the shoe bomber. I have always been consistant. You bend like gumby where American's rights begin and end, maybe not you're consistant in your hackishness Bumble good, W bad.
I think the national debt growth under Bush was ACTUALLY 4.9 trillion. ____________ Nice language granny Savage is using these days. Things must be REALLY getting to her.
Lincoln "played" the slaves and the slavery issue. I see that clearly now. What a horrible thing he did, pretending he was against slavery yet willing to leave it alone in the south when all the time he was just playing politics with the slaves and with the issue and only when the political landscape showed him supporting emancipation would do more good than harm, only then did he issue the Proclamation.
You can bet Obama has "something" up his sleeve...
...he'll do something, then run around the country, like the petulant child he is, and blame the Republicans.
Like I said before. I think he will use his power to inflict as much harm on the American public as possible so he can blame Republicans. ___________________ Right. If Obama "does" something, he'll be blamed for it. If, on the other hand, the situation of the sequester is what does it... Look out, GOP in public opinion!
(The GOP is already getting the blame. Just let the economy really start souring or people really start losing jobs or medical services start being seriously cut back or...or...or....
Hell hath no fury like an electorate scorned. They spoke in the last election.
Paul, Padilla is a US citizen, arrested in the US and held for years without charges or access to counsel. That was illegal as hell. The other two were foreign nationals who attempted to commit crimes, were arrested, charged and convicted under US law.
Not one of them is relevant in the discussion of the use of drones. You are just dodging the truth. As I said, if "Obumble" had not taken out people who although American citizens, were not in this country and were actively plotting to harm Americans, you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
Not one of them is relevant in the discussion of the use of drones. You are just dodging the truth. As I said, if "Obumble" had not taken out people who although American citizens, were not in this country and were actively plotting to harm Americans, you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
Does that include a 16 year old boy ?
There was no evidence he was involved in actively plotting to harm Americans.
His only crime was being the son of a terrorist.
If Bush did that you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
You are outraged at the splashing the water in the face of some real terrorist pieces of shit when Bush is president but give Obama a pass when he arbitrarily murders innocent civilians, including at least one American citizen.
On this issue your hypocrisy is particularly disgusting.
"@remeanie l tested at 750 with high comprehension too. Also blessed with an almost photographic memory. . Almost. Names & faces r a problem"
"@DreamOutLoud619 A gorgeous woman like you is alone? That's just not right! Lol The Chiefs got Alex Smith. AFC West gets more interesting 1:51am - 2 Mar 13"
"@Sobergirlprobz From what we can see, you are a very pretty girl!"
Crocodile tears being shed for a teenage boy killed along with a terrorist. Hmmmm. ________________ We shouldn't have killed Osama either I guess, since some other people got killed too.
I mean, the fact that he took out some 3,000 of our own people...that is no justification for killing some of the people who were with him.
You people have GOT to be aware of how pitiful and hypocritical your arguments are.
OBAMA MAKING PUSH TO TAKE BACK CONGRESS President Obama "is taking the most specific steps of his administration in an attempt to ensure the election of a Democratic-controlled Congress in two years," the Washington Post reports.
"Obama, fresh off his November reelection, began almost at once executing plans to win back the House in 2014, which he and his advisers believe will be crucial to the outcome of his second term and to his legacy as president. He is doing so BY TRYING TO ARTICULATE FOR THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE HIS OWN FEELINGS -- AN EXASPERATION WITH AN OPPOSITION PARTY THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA."
ECHO THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA
ECHO THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA
ECHO THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA _________________________ And it will work. For the American people can understand that sort of exasperation and feel it themselves. ______________
For someone who was all worried about privacy we see who the hypocrite is.
I make no apologies for what I say, here, on Twitter or fb.
As to the snippets you provided. I have "known" the football fan for 2 years or so. She is a criminal defense attorney in San Diego and has an intelligence so far above yours it is hard to believe you are the same species.
One is a second year I believe, student at Penn State and also smart as hell. And btw twit, I do read 750 wpm or more, and have an almost photographic memory. Jealous?
The other girl, is sober and we engage in an occasional dialogue about that. She seems to be smart as hell, well adjusted and not angry at the world like you are. You should try it sometime.
As to looks.. since when do they matter in the greater scheme of things? The picture you saw is about 3 years old, taken by my daughter on the Space Needle in Seattle. Am i the most photogenic person on the planet? Far from it. But what I am not is a close minded old crone who hasn't had an original thought during her pathetic existence.
I follow over 1,500, with widely diverse points of view. From conservatives to liberals, on politics. On the sports I enjoy. There are also friends and family there. People I really know. Ditto on fb. Although I have a far shorter list of 'friends' on fb but it is a different type of media. On Twitter you just follow someone. And unless you are a dick, they don't block you. Which by the way, has never happened to me as far as I know.
I have engaged in twitter 'conversations' with a lot of people, including quite a list of well known public personalities. It's fun. And I make no apologies for what I say.
I am a lot of things you can't understand. But, in most every way, I am a far better person than you are or can aspire to be.
"I was referring to Grandma Savage's fine language in post 2:14 PM yesterday, another sterling example of her commitment to the civility she professes."
I withdrew that, if you only had a memory.
Which, obviously you don't - since you can't remember much of anything.
James, I read that Post piece on what Obama wants to do. It is a, shall we say, a long shot. But if he pulls it off, and I am not saying he will, he will go down as one of the great Presidents.
But for those who laugh at him and his ambitions on that. The list of people who have underestimated the man is long. These folks like to claim that he mislead people, that is the voters, claim they are "low information" voters taken in by a charlatan. That is an easy way to dodge the truth.
He was an unknown, young, inexperienced man with a funny name and on top of that is black. He has been elected by both electoral college and popular vote majorities twice. And a dispassionate observer would say he has quite a list of successes and some failures too. I think his biggest failure, based on a naive belief that the Republicans actually want the country to succeed, not just their party led him to try and work with them. They refused.
So, he is going to make a political gamble. He needs to take 17 seats away from the Republicans. Something like that has never been done.
I don't know whether he will succeed or fail, but I would not bet against him. Those that do have a long, long history of losing.
Now it's time for me to climb into bed with my beautiful wife, whom I love more than life itself and get some more sleep.
But I do have one more comment. James nailed it. For people who claim they dismiss us, don't care what we do or say, the troothers spend a hell of a lot of time and effort on us, don't they?
"But I do have one more comment. James nailed it. For people who claim they dismiss us, don't care what we do or say, the troothers spend a hell of a lot of time and effort on us, don't they?"
Oh, it was no effort - no effort at all.
As to looks? No, they don't matter - if you have a decent personality, if you are a good person, if you aren't a pathological liar - so - yes - with you - looks do matter.
KD, Too much to ask this Pres. to budget and lead
said...
Obama exploded the US Deficits and Debt. sprinting by Bush's little less then 500 billion mark, which was in my opinion way too much spending.
In the coming years Obama will add Trillions more, no amount of new taxes is going to change that fact.
I would like to see the President get into the mood to govern the US Government.
Can you imagine being on the USS Harry S. Truman and be told by the sitting on his hands President that he can not find the Money to let you do your job?
KD, Obama has nothing to do with fuel prices
said...
Ette and CS , JNL did not like the facts on his question about "W" debt vs Obama debt.
He found a need to ask the question, and unlike him and his best buddy HB, we answered his question(s).
JNL believed that for "most" of "W"'s term gasoline averaged above 3.00. The facts proved his belief wrong.
JNL said that no President has anything to do with the price of fuel. Then when show quotes from Obama/Polosi/Ried blaming Bush for the higher cost, well, that was then and now hold-harmless-Obama
I would have enjoyed a lively debate on the National Debt and why James found a need to address the question to me and then run from his question.
As for HB , he could have told us more about his "ton" of money from the sale of his rental and the around $30,000 in taxes which he voted to be imposed upon him.
KD, Cliff and Crisis Legegy of Obama 2 terms
said...
When the President hyped the newest bestest his idea sequester cliff and not one of us fell off that cliff does the left find that kind of over hyping useful?
"Cliff" and "crisis" are not wise or smart management. In fact Managers are paid to reduce crisis and putting a business on the cliff, not driving to one and setting up a picnic.
Any one have a list of "loopholes" that this President wants to close?
And poor poor Mitt. Had he a backbone, he might have won. He should have won. But like so many Republicans still rooted in the past as you all are, he was unable to persuade a sufficient number of voters that he has what it take to be President.
His unwillingness, or perhaps inability to take principled stands against anything, or as a matter of fact for anything doomed him to fail. We want our leaders to stand for something, even if we disagree with them on some aspects of those stands. But if they are not willing to stand for something, and Mitt Romney is unwilling to stand for anything, you usually will not win.
It was well documented that he had changed his stand on nearly every issue over the last twenty years or more. And each time he did so it looked like it was for political expediency. That is the major reason he was rejected.
You assume that a lot of people who watch Fox "News" voted for Obama.
What I found most telling in the interview is that he believed until late that evening he was going to win. Even in a campaign to be President, he was in the Republican bubble. Every single independent poll with the exception of Gallup showed him losing. But they were so isolated from reality they were unable to see the world as it existed.
I see the same thing here every day so it wasn't just Mitt. And it will continue until the idea is crushed.
James....don't you feel that good ol' christian love offer by those 2??? I'm going to take you up on a name change as soon I think of something appropriate.....LOL...it is such an honor being held in such esteem by such 2 bit idjits...!!!
Nope, dumb fuck is just about right for him.
1:55 PM Savageette said... "and especially Savage and Commensa, tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this."
You stupid FUCK - I support same-sex marriage.
Unlike the weasel in the WH - I've ALWAYS supported same-sex marriage, I've never lied about it, saying I've evolved.
2:14 PM Commonsense said... The again, dumb fuck would be just about right for Chicken-James also.
Hey UGA boy.....your school is #1 in my book.....chuckle be proud.
Records The current record for the largest group streak was established at the University of Georgia, with 1,543 simultaneous streakers on March 7, 1974.[27]
I'll bet there are more than a few people this morning wondering why they voted for Barack Obama in the first place."
Maybe at your cult, but not around here. I especially enjoyed Gov. Scott now thinking obamacare is the way to go. Then we have the UGA actuarial still posting the drivel that it will fail. Who to believe?
After bringing up the issue of Bush Debt and finding out that in fact Obama sprinted by Bush in that area of adding more debt in 4 years then Bush did.
More fake data the gw is a hoax. Come on sense, post something inane......LOL
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 3:34 PM GMT on March 01, 2013 +39 The historic summer of 2012 - 2013 is now in the books in Australia as the hottest summer on record, beating the previous mark set in 1997 - 1998 by more than 0.1°C. Australia also roasted through its hottest month on record this summer, with January 2013 topping out as Australia's warmest month since record keeping began in 1910. The oceans surrounding Australia were at their second warmest levels on record during January, contributing to the exceptional heat over the nation. The summer heat peaked during a remarkably long and widespread heatwave in late December and the first half of January, when fourteen of the 112 sites used by the Bureau of Meteorology for long-term monitoring had their hottest day on record. Sydney's 45.8°C (114.4°F) on January 18 and Hobart's 41.8°C (107.2°F) on January 4 were among the places which set new records. The highest temperature during the heatwave was 49.6°C (121.3°F) at Moomba in the far northeast of South Australia--Australia’s highest temperature since 1998. The extreme Australian heat helped push the average land temperature over the entire Southern Hemisphere to its warmest value on record during
Record heat without an El Niño: an unusual occurrence What's notable about the new summer heat record is that is occurred during a “neutral” period in the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (there was neither a La Niña nor El Niño event present.) El Niño conditions add an extra natural bump to temperatures over Australia, and it is difficult to set all-time heat records unless there's an El Niño present. Before 2013, the hottest three summers on record in Australia occurred during El Niño years. Breaking an all-time hottest month and hottest summer record during a non-El Niño year is the type of event that would be difficult to have in Australia without a warming climate.
Dayum catholix....even cardinals don't have enough blood to run 2 heads at the same time. They run the church just like republicons....sad.
A top cardinal who resigned last week amid sexual abuse allegations issued an apology today and said there have been times his sexual conduct "has fallen below the standards expected of me as a priest, archbishop and cardinal."
Cardinal Keith O'Brien, 74, the former Archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, resigned last week following published reports that he made unwanted sexual advances toward four priests in Scotland in the 1980s.
O'Brien has been accused of committing "inappropriate acts" in his relations with three priests and one former priest from the diocese of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, British newspaper The Observer reported last Sunday.
RELATED: Benedict XVI's Tenure as Pope Ends
The cardinal initially denied the claims, but said last week he would not participate in the conclave to choose the pope's successor because the allegations were a distraction. His immediate resignation was accepted Monday by Pope Benedict XVI.
O'Brien reversed course today, issuing a statement
Liberals what are the exact cuts he is proposing?"
You continue to amaze me at you gross lack of any intellect. You'll get that answer right after boner describes the loopholes he will close. Oh wait, he took that back like the cheapass politician all the republicons are. Thanx for playing.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt for President Mohammed Morsi's pledges of political and economic reforms by releasing $250 million in American aid to support the country's "future as a democracy."
Great we have zerO money for the USS Harry Truman but we do for Egypt.
Egypt is trying to meet conditions to close on a $4.8 billion loan package from the International Monetary Fund. An agreement would unlock more of the $1 billion in U.S. assistance promised by President Barack Obama last year and set to begin flowing with Kerry's announcement.
"The United States can and wants to do more," Kerry said."
Great 250 million now, a Billion more later, and yet The CnC, refused to fund the Men and Woman of the USS Harry S. Truman.
Seems that we have a President that for got his primary job.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt
What a great idea......things seem realitively calm there and they get some jingle to help... Wonder who thought of doing this? Canter, Ryan, Rush???? But if you are any indication of the lunatic fringe, the blogosphere will be jumping shortly!!! LOL at you, again.
542 comments:
1 – 200 of 542 Newer› Newest»Dick Cheney Tears Into Condoleeza Rice
In an upcoming documentary about the legacy of Dick Cheney, Foreign Policy notes the former vice president lashes out at Condoleezza Rice for overriding his recommendation to bomb a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007.
Said Cheney: "I thought [destroying the reactor] would reassert the kind of authority and influence we had back in '03 when we took down Saddam Hussein and eliminated Iraq as a potential source of WMD. Condi was on the wrong side of all those issues so we had significant issues."
"In his 2011 memoir In My Time, Cheney called the former diplomat 'naive' for her attempts to negotiate with North Korea and said she once 'tearfully admitted' her mistakes to him in his office."
_____________
Well, I guess that's the end of her as a candidate for Prez or even Veep.
#jedimindmeld
Oops
The Pope resigns.
The Exorcist II is released in theaters.
Coincidence or... ???
James New Leaf said...
Hey, Machine gun, barbeque, Egyptian hieroglyphics, Mormon trinity, Abram's birthplace, climate expert Commensa,
What happened to your prediction that Obama would lose the election because the gay marriage issue would cost him the votes of conservative Christian blacks?
BLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPPPPPPPP!!!
WRONG WRONG WRONG
_______________
Appears blacks have some understanding of what it means to gays to be rejected, eh?
Second class citizenship just doesn't sit well with anyone.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: "I am saying that everybody is going to have to do something, and the one key to this whole thing is trying to make sure we keep in mind who we are here for. We're not here for ourselves, we're not here for our parties. We're not here to advance our electoral prospects. We're here for American families who have been getting battered pretty good over the last four years, are just starting to see the economy improved. Businesses are just starting to see some confidence coming back, and this is not a win for anybody. This is a loss for the American people."
EVEN BETTER WHEN YOU SEE IT
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/01/obama_american_families_have_been_getting_battered_pretty_good_over_the_last_four_years.html
"We're not here for ourselves, we're not here for our parties. We're not here to advance our electoral prospects. We're here for American families"
What a load of crap.
He loads every working family with tax increases, astronomical heating bills, astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE, runs around the country lyin' his ass off - and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
The guy's a psycho.
Thomas Hobbes wrote that the life of man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” Today’s White House definitely isn’t poor, lavishly feeding off the wealth of the American taxpayer, and the current presidency certainly isn’t short, with nearly four more years to run. But it is undeniably nasty and brutish, as veteran Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward has found after questioning President Obama’s narrative on the sequester issue.
He loads every working family with tax increases, astronomical heating bills, astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE, runs around the country lyin' his ass off - and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
The sycophant doesn't care what his actions are only his flowery prose
The cog dis amongst them is amazing to me
coming to America
Nearly 40 per cent of doctors would not recommend their own hospital to friends or family, startling new figures reveal.
A further one in three do not believe NHS managers act on the concerns of patients.
"The cog dis amongst them is amazing to me"
Me too.
I'm absolutely astounded that his supporters can't see through his crap.
They're just not very smart, Cali.
"coming to America"
Like Obama's FEMA - ours will be different...better.
smdfh
I admit it. I am quacking up.
I like "Duck Dynasty". Of course I know and am related to people like that.
Quack!
What can we learn from the story beyond the details in question? Off the top of my head I can think of a few other conclusions to be drawn from the facts. Obama is a shameless liar for petty partisan purposes. A shameless liar for petty partisan purposes is a man of bad character. Obama’s mendacity exposes him as a man of bad character, or so it would have been thought in ages past.
Obama’s lies permeate his attacks on the Republican Party. They are part and parcel of the permanent campaign. The campaign is a parade of lies marshaled in a malevolent partisan cause. That’s a story too.
The shamelessness of Obama’s prevarication in part reflects Obama’s character but it also reflects his judgment that he won’t be called on his lies by Woodward’s colleagues in the mainstream media. He has undertaken to wage a campaign of lies already knowing that Woodward had put the true story on the record in the book he published this past September.
So Obama’s campaign is predicated on the judgment that Woodward’s colleagues in the mainstream media will do nothing to disturb the party line. Although Obama is a man of poor character, he has a good bead on the character of the journalists who are paid to cover him for a living. His judgment is that they will cover for him rather than cover him, and in this judgment he is right on the mark.
Let's look into the twit's wild-eyed accusation, shall we?
1: He loads every working family with tax increases.
Truth, the CONGRESS passed the law that repealed the witholding tax reduction.
2: astronomical heating bills,
Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
3: astronomical gas prices for EVERYONE,
Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
4: runs around the country lyin' his ass off - Be specific. Prove he is lying, with facts, figures, verifiable information. You can't because that's far above your ability, but you should at least try if you are going to make such accusations. Your ODS is not specific enough.
and he has the nerve to say HE'S there for families?!?!?
And do you really believe he wants to damage, intentionally damage families? Really? Based on what? ODS?
Provide something that contains something called facts, not just your emotions and "feelings".
You can't.
Truth, the President has next to no power to control energy prices, they are set by the MARKET. You know.. buyers, sellers, speculators, commodity traders and the fact that a lot of refineries went down at the same time. Not due to any government actions.
Have you seen the economic numbers from the EU, China?
It's the fiat being printed.
You don't know shit about economics stop, while you're behind
Again this is austerity to many here
So let’s do the math with the sequestration cuts. $44 billion equals one eightieth of the federal budget. A Big Mac extra value meal contains 1,320 calories. One eightieth of 1,320 is 16.5 calories. An average McDonald’s french fry has 6.5 calories. So now the arithmetic is simple: if we were to cut the equivalent of the sequestration dollars out of a Big Mac Extra Value Meal, we would eliminate 2 1/2 french fries.
So: we order a Big Mac Extra Value Meal, and we eat the Big Mac. We drink the medium Coke. We eat 84 out of 87 french fries. We take the 85th french fry and eat half of it. We place the other half back in the bag, along with two more uneaten french fries. And that is the “diet” that equals the sequestration cuts. Suffice it to say that we have a very long way to go before we have to start worrying about spending cuts being too deep.
***The guy's a psycho.***
The psychos are running around loose in here, and have Hb and me quacking up.
A while back gas was $3.17 here locally.
Funny though, nobody was blaming Obama for that.
A while back gas was $3.17 here locally
Are really this stupid?
The average price for one gallon of unleaded gasoline has increased nearly every month since Barack Obama was inaugurated in January 2009. At that time, when George W. Bush was leaving office, the price was $1.78 per gallon. Today, three years and one month later, the average price is $3.64. - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gas-when-bush-left-office-178-gas-today-364-highest-average-price-calif-420#sthash.fXwxbBvx.dpuf
You really are retarded
***Are you really this stupid?***
I guess not:
______________
GAS PRICES WERE $4.21 A GALLON UNDER BUSH - SO WHY IS OBAMA TO BLAME FOR GAS PRICES TODAY?
The hypocrisy of the Conservatives never fails to amaze me and the hypocrisy of blaming President Obama for rising gas prices is no exception!
Gas price under bush went to $4.21 a gallon and was over $3.00 a gallon most of his last term in office.
The only reason gas was at $1.85 when President Obama took office is because of the economic crash which greatly reduced demand and the crash effected all countries not just the US.
Gas prices rise with demand and as the economy has improved it is completely normal for gas prices to increase as more businesses use fuel for deliveries, more trucks on the road, more people traveling, and more people driving to work.
So our rising gas price is actually an indicator that the economy is recovering.
We also see a spike when the Libya UN action happened and now with Iran and Israel in a standoff an Syria effecting the region we are seeing another spike as speculators are betting on a war.
Anyone that tries to blame president Obama for higher gas prices is a fool and drilling more oil would not lower the price because we do not have a shortage and oil drilling has quadrupled in the last 4 years and the US is now a net exporter of oil.
So ignore the talking heads and fear monger Conservatives and complain all you want about higher gas prices but don't blame President Obama!
The only reason gas was at $1.85 when President Obama took office is because of the economic crash which greatly reduced demand and the crash effected all countries not just the US.
Idiot we had .1% growth in the economy that explains a doubling of gas prices?
You're out of your sycophant
*your league sycophant
Fiat? Want to return to the gold standard now?
I have seen the news out of Europe. Great Britain is headed into a double dip because of austerity.
You arrogant prick. When the stupid farmer is bloviating you never call his bs out, now do you?
And you admitted you took only required economic classes and you do what now? Oh yeah. Sell insurance. Oh boy.
Look, one does not have to be as edumacated as you and the farmer to understand the basics of economics. It was a long time ago, far far away, but because I find the subject interesting, I took the AP economic classes in my junior and senior years of HS. I haven't forgotten all of it, not by a long shot.
But I DO understand the basics, and despite your desperate need to blame Obama for fuel prices, that does not stand up to even the most basic economic theory. And you damn well know it. And if you don't.. then you are dumber than you look when you make such claims.
World wide demand isn't a factor? Neither are the refinery closures?
You are out of your league.
Go back to the A league farm team.
And you admitted you took only required economic classes and you do what now? Oh yeah. Sell insurance. Oh boy.
What Econ classes have you taken carpenter?
Your jealousy of those more inherently knowledgable than you isn't pretty.
Quitter why have energy prices nearly doubled under Obumble?
They are coming to get you Paul!
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/41687_Sarah_Palin-_The_Government_Is_Stockpiling_Ammo_to_Use_Against_US_Citizens
This from the woman that you voted for!
You inability to create a rational thought after being hammered doesn't speak we'll for you...
*You=your
Well
Fucking auto correct
What has Obama done to cause this spike?
What drives it is world wide demand. That is a big part of it. But the major cause at this time are the large number of maintenance shut downs. By what appears to be a coincidence, quite a few of them are down now.
And what you ignore is just how much domestic production has increased in the last four years. And it only looks like that is likely to increase over the next twenty years.
Oh, and by the way once the Keystone XL pipeline is approved it will be renamed the Obama Pipeline.
As I said, I took AP classes in Econ for two years. It was difficult but fascinating. I learned to grasp the basic concepts.
That's more than most of the troothers can say. They just blame Obama even if there is no rational reason to believe it.
My inability to what? Write something that someone three sheets to the wind can understand?
I don't speak gin and tonic!
You hammered nails i actually have a degree from one of the best business schools in the country.
Nuff said.
I'm out old man, the boy has a double header tomorrow.
Rant rave and make no sence, it's you at your finest
BTW fat man i don't drink gin, and unlike you i am not a quitter.
LMAO
I see Cali rolled doughboy and barbecued Chicken-James.
One small point about the payroll tax.
During the "fiscal cliff" crisis when Obama got his way on tax increases he also insisted the payroll tax holiday not be extended.
Between that and the taxes buried in Obamacare this president has raise taxes on the middle class more than any president since Carter.
Prove he is lying, with facts, figures, verifiable information.
That one is easy:
Sequester spin: Obama’s incorrect claim of Capitol janitors receiving ‘a pay cut’
Obama’s remarks continue the administration’s pattern of overstating the potential impact of the sequester, which we have explored this week. But this error is particularly bad--and nerve-wracking to the janitors and security guards who were misled by the president’s comments.
We originally thought this was maybe a Two Pinocchio rating, but in light of the AOC memo and the confirmation that security guards will not face a pay cut, nothing in Obama’s statement came close to being correct.
Four Pinocchios
That from the Obama-friendly Washington Post. It is just one of his many lies that can be easily proven.
BTW doughboy that's more proof than you have ever showed when you accuse anyone of lying.
Four Pinocchios, October, 2012...
" Obama’s fanciful claim that Congress ‘proposed’ the sequester"
"BTW doughboy that's more proof than you have ever showed when you accuse anyone of lying."
HB's as big a pathological liar as Obama - AND a total psycho, like Obama.
He's back to posting Nutting's lies...for about the fifth or sixth time.
Three Pinocchios
" UPDATE: The Associated Press also dug into the numbers and came to the same conclusion as we did. “The problem with that rosy claim is that the Wall Street bailout is part of the calculation. The bailout ballooned the 2009 budget just before Obama took office, making Obama’s 2010 results look smaller in comparison. And as almost $150 billion of the bailout was paid back during Obama’s watch, the [Nutting] analysis counted them as government spending cuts,” the AP said. “It also assumes Obama had less of a role setting the budget for 2009 than he really did.”"
Doesn't stop HB's lies, now does it?
Doughboy has constructed an alternative reality with his lies.
He get particularly incensed when fact interferes with that world.
The sequestration deadline has come and gone.
The mail is still being delivered.
Solders are still serving their country.
Parks are still open.
Seniors are still getting social security and Medicare.
Food stamps are still being issued.
Welfare recipients are still getting their checks.
Government is still functioning.
The world didn't end.
"The world didn't end." --- yet
You can bet Obama has "something" up his sleeve...
...he'll do something, then run around the country, like the petulant child he is, and blame the Republicans.
Repeat After Me" HB
So all we have to do is give 2009 debt to bush and the recovery to Obama.
2008 Debt held by Federal Reserve
$0.5 trillion
2012 Debt held by Federal Reserve
2.1 Trillion
Can't forget the added debt on the backs of us tax payers by Obama at the federal reserve.
Debt/GDP Ratio
Bush 2008 70%
Obama 2012 102% (forward)
Wow, the "Day After" and things are the same.
Obama signed the cuts into law last night. That is twice he signed for these cuts.
When will the left here grow up and begin to understand?
National Deficit
2008: $459 billion
2009: $1,413 billion
HalfBaked will you ever be able to understand financial/Fiscal/Monetary issues?
You can bet Obama has "something" up his sleeve...
...he'll do something, then run around the country, like the petulant child he is, and blame the Republicans.
Like I said before. I think he will use his power to inflict as much harm on the American public as possible so he can blame Republicans.
He wants the house in 2014 so he can railroad his agenda in his remaining two years.
"Like I said before. I think he will use his power to inflict as much harm on the American public as possible so he can blame Republicans."
Oh - I didn't see that, lol - sorry.
Some people really are funny...
In response to the liberal freak in Wisonsin's tweets as follows:
.@govwalker spent more than Jeffrey Dahmer to beat criminal charges.
— Graeme Zielinski (@gjzielinski) March 1, 2013
.@govwalker had better lawyers than Jeffrey Dahmer in beating the rap. Clear that he committed crimes.
— Graeme Zielinski (@gjzielinski) March 1, 2013
What do @govwalker and Jeffrey Dahmer have in common?
— Graeme Zielinski (@gjzielinski) March 1, 2013
THIS...
"Doesn’t President Obama remind you of a ClusterFluck?"
lol - yes - yes he does.
Gas price under bush went to $4.21 a gallon and was over $3.00 a gallon most of his last term in office."
Nope
Gas Buddy.
http://gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx
James, please look up the facts prior to posting.
What meetings are the President/VP and Treasury Sec holding today and with whom?
Surely, they are working today to save the US from Obama's "self-inflicted wound".
"James, please look up the facts prior to posting."
He isn't interested in facts - only lies to promote his Messiah, King George Hussein Milhouse Obama.
Boy oh boy. The ODS crowd is up early.
Ignoring you loons.
Paul, you made the accusation that said Obama was at fault for the high gasoline prices. I asked for proof. Not an op ed piece. But alas, my hand held device acted up and I lost that post. But the question remains. Specifically, why is the President at fault for the cost of gasoline, a market driven cost. But what ever clear liquid was involved left you unable to provide a coherent response at 2:30 AM your time.
I can't imagine how you feel at this moment but it can't be good. LOL
As to you worthless dipshits, just keep believing you are winning this political battle and nothing has to change. That kind of thinking has lost you five of the last six Presidential election popular votes. And that is unlikely to change if you persist in continuing your childish "LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE" attacks. Most people, being more rational than you, dismiss this correctly, as the raving of unbalanced lunatics
Could it be that OBama promises on lower health care cost on private policies never happened, or that CA taxes will take another 15 k from his "ton" of money home sale and that Obama's new taxes will take again that much and more. Or is he upset that the unemployment rate is not where Obama promised it would be or the GNP or wages.
What meetings are the President/VP and Treasury Sec holding today and with whom?
FORE!!!!
James looking at the data only 8 months out of "w" last four year term where fuel prices over 3 dollars a gallon in Kansas.
Good to hear your fuel price is only 3.17 yesterday, please do post the address of that station so I can verify your claim.
Thanks
By year average price in USA
2000 thru 2010
1.484
1.420
1.345
1.561
1.852
2.270
2.572
2.796
3.246
2.353
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epmr_pte_nus_dpg&f=a
Oh, Obama is going to gin up a story, take the house and use it to intentionally destroy the nation!
That is totally rational. The only reason most of the country finds that kind of thinking irrational, is the One has deluded them. I see it now Ette! You have looked past the smoke and mirrors to see the evil behind the affable mask. The nation will forever be in debt to you for saving them from themselves!
Oh my. You guys have got it all figured out. You better stock up on weapons and ammunition. Or the nearest FEMA camp will be your home for the next four years at least! Did you see how much ammunition they brought to get ready for this?
The World Net Daily has been documenting this!
And remain true to the troother motto:
"It isn't paranoia if they really are out to get you! "
(/satire)
"Specifically, why is the President at fault for the cost of gasoline"
The same reasons you lunatics blamed W.
"It isn't paranoia if they really are out to get you! "
Remember when W was listening to Aunt Daisy?
Idiot.
I have had enough fun at your expense. . Time to catch a few more zzz's before the jack-booted thugs show up at my doorstep.
Hmm. Only Lisa would have been around to make that claim. That was before this alter ego showed up.
She was a right winger but somewhat rational. This alter ego is not.
Oh the mysteries of winger world.
"Like I said before. I think he will use his power to inflict as much harm on the American public as possible so he can blame Republicans."
now that you mention it, do the ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY MILLION job cuts kick in today or monday?
- rrb
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epmr_pte_nus_dpg&f=a
make sure you click on the annual button and you will see how wrong James is on the facts.
Moving ahead the Keystone Pipeline will finally be approved by John Kerry and Obama and millions of dollars will flood over the Canadian boarder and into the USA.
Petro Jobs are accounting for more and more jobs , where are the green energy pixy dust jobs?
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY MILLION job cuts kick in today or monday?" RRB
Don't forget this disaster of a US House Speaker.
Nancy claims that we lose 500 million American jobs each month .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8hMJVXt09E
A must listen. CA has some really bright people , we must listen to them.
Unemployment benefits are creating jobs faster than practically any other program, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday.
Talking to reporters, the House speaker was defending a jobless benefits extension against those who say it gives recipients little incentive to work. By her reasoning, those checks are helping give somebody a job.
"It injects demand into the economy," Pelosi said, arguing that when families have money to spend it keeps the economy churning. "It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name."
Pelosi said the aid has the "double benefit" of helping those who lost their jobs and acting as a "job creator" on the side.
Maxine Waters wants to Socialize the Oil Companies.
"Only Lisa would have been around to make that claim. That was before this alter ego showed up."
Trust me, I wish I was in my 40's like her.
Funny how you seem to remember someone from 7 years ago, but she has no idea who you are - could it be that you're the lisa lisa slut troll?
BTW, idiot -
It WASN'T BEFORE THIS BLOG...
"WEDNESDAY, JUL 9, 2008 05:59 AM CDT
Suing George W. Bush: A bizarre and troubling tale
U.S. officials went to extremes to stifle our legal challenge to Bush's warrantless surveillance -- but a federal judge says the program is criminal, anyway."
It is not without a bit of irony that, in the 40 years since the explosion of the Watergate story, Bob Woodward would again be under attack from the White House for trying to tell the truth. But this time the attack is coming from a Democrat.
While Barack Obama may not share the Nixon pedigree, he and his White House are the closest thing to the Nixon regime of any that we have seen since then -- both in the extent of their paranoia and their willingness to suppress the truth and push the boundaries of law.
In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness.
Pat Caddell
Ette, the left here is not about to admit they are wrong.
The Promises of lower health care insurance cost, lower unemployment, and lower by half yearly deficits and higher incomes are just four that he failed on in his first term.
Now for this term, ObamaTax is collecting money, I know what is being done with those new billions, it is helping to hide the true spending of Obama.
One of us conservatives posted a piece showing the influx of billions of dollars to the US Treasury from TARP, Obama uses those billions to lower the next rise in deficit.
One more point, I give credit for James pointed us to a link where this President spoke in a Saturday chat of "lowering Debt" . It would be nice IF all of those economic wizards Mr Obama has hired could find a way to put out a Budget.
With a Budget the President gets to show us his numbers, his priorities and his plan to get to his promised National Debt reduction in just under four years.
Remember that quaint ideal of a President leading.
"In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness."
Ditto
Pat Caddell - a dying breed. The lunatics are running the democrat party.
This has got to be one of the President's BEST weekly addresses.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/weekly-address
FROM THE WEEKLY ADDRESS:
A majority of the American people agree with me on this approach – including a majority of Republicans. We just need Republicans in Congress to catch up with their own party and the rest of the country.
NH Gun Store Depicts Obama As ‘Firearms Salesman Of The Year’
Another lie from the psychotic pathological liar...
"The Pinocchio Test
Obama’s remarks continue the administration’s pattern of overstating the potential impact of the sequester, which we have explored this week. But this error is particularly bad--and nerve-wracking to the janitors and security guards who were misled by the president’s comments.
We originally thought this was maybe a Two Pinocchio rating, but in light of the AOC memo and the confirmation that security guards will not face a pay cut, nothing in Obama’s statement came close to being correct.
FOUR COUNT 'EM FOUR
"Sequester spin: Obama’s false claim of Capitol janitors receiving ‘a pay cut’
Dear AOC Employees,
Sequestration takes effect today and the AOC’s current funding for Fiscal Year 2013 will bereduced by approximately 5.3%. While this reduction in funding will be difficult for us to absorb,the good news is the AOC has taken proactive steps to slow spending and plan for the cuts sincelast October. As I mentioned in my note to you last week, our planning and preparations will allowus to implement changes more slowly, reducing the impact of Sequestration on our customersand AOC employees.
At this time, we will begin implementing the AOC’s Sequestration plan. The top priorities in theplan are maintaining critical support for Congress and the Supreme Court and supporting AOCemployees. We will focus our efforts first on the following:
•Reducing or eliminating certain contracts
•Postponing some repair and alteration projects
•Trimming maintenance and operations programs
•Reducing bench stock and supply levels
•Delaying replacement of old equipment
•Further reducing overtime, training, and awards
•Limiting new hiring
We do not anticipate furloughs for AOC employees as a result of Sequestration. However, we willnot know the AOC’s final budget for this year until Congress passes legislation to replace theexisting continuing resolution, which expires March 27. If that legislation further reduces our budget, we may have to consider additional spending reductions, which could include furloughs.We will utilize furloughs, if necessary, only as a way to avoid more harmful actions such as aReduction in Force.
In the coming weeks, you will hear more news as we begin to implement different actions in our Sequestration plan. Additionally, I will provide another update once we learn more about our finalfunding level for the rest of Fiscal Year 2013. To stay informed, I encourage you to subscribetoday to receive AOC news and announcements to your personal email address or phone -subscribe today.
It is important that we continue to work together as one team to overcome the challenges createdby these funding cuts and achieve our critical mission. I truly appreciate how hard you work everyday to care for our customers.
Thank you, Stephen T. Ayers, FAIA, LEED AP Architect of the Capitol"
At this rate, WaPo is gonna run out of Pinocchios
When we have a statesman for a President, he says things like this:
___________
I know there are Republicans in Congress who would actually rather see tax loopholes closed than let these cuts go through. And I know there are Democrats who’d rather do smart entitlement reform than let these cuts go through. There’s a caucus of common sense. And I’m going to keep reaching out to them to fix this for good.
Because the American people are weary of perpetual partisanship and brinksmanship. This is America, and in America, we don’t careen from one manufactured crisis to another. We make smart choices. We plan. We prioritize. So I’m going to push through this paralysis and keep fighting for the real challenges facing middle-class families. I’m going to keep pushing for high-quality preschool for every family that wants it, and make sure the minimum wage becomes a wage you can live on. I’m going to keep pushing to fix our immigration system, repair our transportation system, and keep our children safe from gun violence.
That’s the work you elected me to do. That’s what I’m focused on every single day. Thanks.
______________
Cue the stupid "man juice" comments.
"A majority of the American people agree with me on this approach"
The majority of American didn't want Obamacare either - but it was shoved down our throats.
"Because the American people are weary of perpetual partisanship and brinksmanship. This is America, and in America, we don’t careen from one manufactured crisis to another."
That was before the pathological liar was crowned King.
"NH Gun Store Depicts Obama As ‘Firearms Salesman Of The Year’'
lol
"A majority of the American people INCLUDING EVEN REPUBLICANS agree with me on this approach AS POLLING SHOWS"
FIFY
You're welcome. :-)
James, how about those gas prices in Bushes last four years?
Just admit you got those facts wrong.
Just admit you got those facts wrong.
My only detailed contribution on this topic was the article I posted at 10:58PM. If there was something wrong there, it was the article that was at error.
Glad to be of help. :-)
I love Liberal Math, Take the deficit of 2009 add it to the deficits of "W" and looking, Obama sucks a lot less.
Going forward, IS there one Liberal that believes that the National Debt is going to be smaller in four years then it is today?
"close tax loopholes"
From Obama's address today, anyone got a list of those tax law changes he has proposed?
KD
James, good to see you continue to have your standards.. all of them.
You said that "W" had an over 1 trillion dollar deficit in 2008, never happened.
You said that gasoline was over $3 for "most" of "W"'s last term, it was not.
Some plain talk and smart talk on gas prices.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/business/gas-prices-are-out-of-any-presidents-control.html?_r=0
Again, glad to be helpful. :-)
My only detailed contribution on this topic"
Admitting you spam, nice of you to finally own it.
Federal Reserve see's weak economy thru 2016, slow growth, little job creation and quagmire.
TY Obama voters, you created it, you own it.
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
Oh now they are out of the control of this President, but when "W" was in office, different standards, again.
Ok, fair enough, then Obama/Polosi s should have never made comments that they could do something about those high fuel prices.
Recall Obama released oil from the US Strategic reserves to lower the price at the pump that at the time he said was hurting the economy.
How about now, do high prices at the pump hurt the US Economy or is it just a built in cost.
There is the endorsed answer to all liberal problems.
Thanks for endorsing it James.
"A better approach would be to gradually raise the gasoline tax to levels similar to those in Western Europe"
Every time there is a problem , tax it.
Inquiring minded James said...
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
"James said...
Inquiring minded James said...
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?"
less than half as much in 8 years as in skeets 0linsky's first 4.
but i know that if skeets really tries hard he can get us to $50 TRILLION before his regime slinks back to cabrini green.
- rrb
He won't respond James. He is too
busy giving HIS man juice to Bessie.
RRB,
Hate to tell you, but you are wrong.
Try again. And why not do it with actual figures?
(Hb, you guess RRB is too distracted by giving or getting man juice to get the answer right?)
Changing the subject: From the brilliant press conference yesterday:
____________
Christi Parsons.
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: Hey, Christi.
Q Mr. President, your administration weighed in yesterday on the Proposition 8 case. A few months ago it looked like you might be averse to doing that, and I just wondered if you could talk a little bit about your deliberations and how your thinking evolved on that. Were there conversations that were important to you? Were there things that you read that influenced your thinking?
THE PRESIDENT: As everybody here knows, last year, upon a long period of reflection, I concluded that we cannot discriminate against same-sex couples when it comes to marriage; that the basic principle that America is founded on -- the idea that we're all created equal -- applies to everybody, regardless of sexual orientation, as well as race or gender or religion or ethnicity.
And I think that the same evolution that I've gone through is an evolution that the country as a whole has gone through. And I think it is a profoundly positive thing. So that when the Supreme Court essentially called the question by taking this case about California's law, I didn’t feel like that was something that this administration could avoid. I felt it was important for us to articulate what I believe and what this administration stands for.
And although I do think that we're seeing, on a state-by-state basis, progress being made -- more and more states recognizing same-sex couples and giving them the opportunity to marry and maintain all the benefits of marriage that heterosexual couples do -- when the Supreme Court asks, do you think that the California law, which doesn't provide any rationale for discriminating against same-sex couples other than just the notion that, well, they're same-sex couples, if the Supreme Court asks me or my Attorney General or Solicitor General, do we think that meets constitutional muster, I felt it was important for us to answer that question honestly -- and the answer is no.
Q And given the fact that you do hold that position about gay marriage, I wonder if you thought about just -- once you made the decision to weigh in, why not just argue that marriage is a right that should be available to all people of this country?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, that's an argument that I’ve made personally. The Solicitor General in his institutional role going before the Supreme Court is obliged to answer the specific question before them. And the specific question presented before the Court right now is whether Prop 8 and the California law is unconstitutional.
And what we’ve done is we’ve put forward a basic principle, which is -- which applies to all equal protection cases. Whenever a particular group is being discriminated against, the Court asks the question, what’s the rationale for this -- and it better be a good reason. And if you don't have a good reason, we’re going to strike it down.
And what we’ve said is, is that same-sex couples are a group, a class that deserves heightened scrutiny, that the Supreme Court needs to ask the state why it’s doing it. And if the state doesn't have a good reason, it should be struck down. That's the core principle as applied to this case.
Now, the Court may decide that if it doesn't apply in this case, it probably can't apply in any case. There’s no good reason for it. If I were on the Court, that would probably be the view that I’d put forward. But I’m not a judge, I’m the President. So the basic principle, though, is let’s treat everybody fairly and let’s treat everybody equally. And I think that the brief that's been presented accurately reflects our views.
_______________________
Hey, TROOTHERS.
and especially Savage and Commensa,
tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this.
Quote him where he is wrong and tell us why he is wrong.
Thank you. We all await your answers.
Lets arm everyone!!!
By Natasha Lennard
A Texas public school employee was accidentally shot and wounded during a district-sponsored handgun safety class. According to local news sources KLTV and the Tyler Morning Telegraph, maintenance worker Glenn Geddie was accidentally shot after a training session aimed toward arming employees.
A statement from the district superintendent read:
At the conclusion of the CHL training on February 27, 2013, one certified person stayed for private instruction with the instructor and had a mechanical malfunction with his weapon. With the assistance of the instructor, the malfunction was addressed, but the gun misfired and the bullet ricocheted coming back to strike the VISD employee in the left leg. The VISD employee was attended to at the scene and transferred to Tyler for further treatment. The injury is not life threatening or disabling. Because of privacy and security issues we cannot make any further statement.
The accident will not affect the district’s decision, in light of the Sandy Hook massacre and other school shootings, to arm employees. Since the Connecticut shooting, a number of school districts nationwide have moved to arm teachers and school employees either by pushing for a legislation shifts on concealed weapons in schools, or, as in one Michigan township, by training school employees as volunteer reserve police officers, enabling them to carry concealed arms
especially Savage and Commensa,
tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this.
Quote him where he is wrong and tell us why he is wrong.
Thank you. We all await your answers."
Been away for 10 days and I see the quality of their arguments remains the same, bottom of the barrel......LOL
d, welcome back.
I think you should come up with another name -- and my reason is not primarily the f word.
Now, I know you are throwing back in their faces something they threw at you, but I think some other name would be better.
Brilliant f
Even that would be better
Just Da Truth
It will cause an allergic reaction in the Troothers.
, welcome back.
I think you should come up with another name -- and my reason is not primarily the f word.
Now, I know you are throwing back in their faces something they threw at you, but I think some other name would be better.
Brilliant f
Even that would be better
Nope, dumb fuck is just about right for him.
"and especially Savage and Commensa,
tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this."
You stupid FUCK - I support same-sex marriage.
Unlike the weasel in the WH - I've ALWAYS supported same-sex marriage, I've never lied about it, saying I've evolved.
The again, dumb fuck would be just about right for Chicken-James also.
Twit, as usual you save all your anger for Obama and give Republicans a pass.
I thought Obama was playing politics with same sex marriage. But it's also possible he did wrestle with the idea. Neither one of us knows for sure.
But consider this. Romney himself has now come out in favor and several members of his campaign staff have signed amicus briefs in support of the case that is in front of the SCOTUS on California's Proposition 8. But they waited until the election was over to avoid insulting bigots like Machine Gun Mensa. But you are PISSED at Obama.
The Republicans, well, in your mind they were just doing what they had to do.
Hypocrite.
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
Answer $ 4.756 Trillion (8 years)
Obama $ 5.733 Trillion (4 years)
Need any thing else JNL?
HB, unlike you I answer question directed to me.
"But you are PISSED at Obama"
I'm not pissed at him now over his supposeded "evolution" - I got over it. I knew he played them - they knew he played them - it's just what he does.
You're going to sit there and tell me he struggled with same-sex marriage, when he did't bat an eye when he voted AGAINST born-alive bills?
LMAO - fool
"The again, dumb fuck would be just about right for Chicken-James also."
Yep - it fits all three of them, lol.
I thought Obama was playing politics with same sex marriage. But it's also possible he did wrestle with the idea. Neither one of us knows for sure.
But consider this. Romney himself has now come out in favor
Doughboy again lies. Romney himself has not come out for same sex marriage.
His public position has been marriage is between one man and one women and that position has not changed.
How will the left react when Obama approves the Keystone Pipeline, throwing the green movement under oil interests .
Obama, his team struggling with accuracy when explaining impact of sequester cuts
They're not struggling, they are out and out lying.
Obama described the country's energy picture in 2008, when gas prices were closing in on $4 a gallon. Then, it was a clear sign of "Washington's failure to lead on energy," which was "turning the middle-class squeeze into a devastating vise-grip for millions of Americans."
"For the well-off in this country," Obama said in May 2008, "high gas prices are mostly an annoyance, but to most Americans they're a huge problem, bordering on a crisis."
In 2013 we are bordering upon a crisis, right Mr Obama.
Democrat Sen. Max Baucus on Obama’s “Sequester Cuts”: “The White House Recommended It, Frankly, Back in August 2011″
Then Woodward.
But that does not stop Obama from saying it was created by others.
Because he knows facts just don't matter it is the message and blame.
He wins at blaming others.
"They're not struggling, they are out and out lying."
lol - if he ever told the TRUTH, he might melt!
It's easy to deal with the Keystone XL pipeline.
We will rename it the Obama Pipeline.
"We will rename it the Obama Pipeline."
A pipeline passing gas would be about right...
"gas" - so to speak
August 2008 Obama declared rising energy costs to be "one of the most dangerous and urgent threats this nation has ever faced" and that gas prices "are wiping out paychecks and straining businesses."
Today, it is a sign of economic growth and honey flowing in the streets again.
Never mind historic drop in disposable income to low and middle income earners.
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
Answer $ 4.756 Trillion (8 years)
Obama $ 5.733 Trillion (4 years)
Why did JNL want these numbers?
"would not lower gas prices today, it would not lower gas prices next year and it would not lower gas prices five years from now." Obama 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/business/energy-environment/report-sees-us-as-top-oil-producer-in-5-years.html?_r=0
Obama is wrong so often on economic issues.
The United States will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading oil producer by about 2017 and will become a net oil exporter by 2030, the International Energy Agency said Monday.
Keystone Pipeline how long before Liberals get behind Obama's bold move to approve it after his re-election?
Reminder...
The psycho pathological liar lied.
“There was a specific mention in the news today by a high ranking official that said ‘The employees that clean and maintain the US Capitol will receive a cut in pay’ (not a specific quote but close to it). This is NOT true. Therefore, I request that you please notify all our employees about the importance of ignoring media reports.”
The psycho pathological liar lied.
The approval ratings for the pathological liar has nosedived to 47% and is still falling.
George Will: Obama Has 'So Gone Over the Top in His Rhetoric He’s Even Losing the Mainstream Media'
Syndicated columnist George Will made a statement on the Laura Ingraham Radio Show Friday that should make people on both sides of the aisle and both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue take notice.
"I think the President has at long last so gone over the top in his rhetoric that he’s even losing the mainstream media" .
Will is right about Obama going over the top. But I think he's wrong when he said Obama is losing the main stream media. They have too much invested in him.
George Will: Obama Has 'So Gone Over the Top in His Rhetoric He’s Even Losing the Mainstream Media'
Fixed link.
The Obama pipeline won't be passing gas. I leave that to you guys and your inane hatred.
Cold enough in Florida to light a fire tonight.
Cold enough in Florida to light a fire tonight.
Brutal watching the baseball game today. They couldn't grip the ball, after a foul they were shaking their hands....
There seems to be something you twits can't understand. Obama is a politician. And yes, even the Plastic Jesus as you call him, does things for political reasons. I can't think of any President in my lifetime who did not do the same thing.
So yes, he does and says things that are self-serving. BFD. What he hasn't done, that his immediate predecessor did. It is well documented that the Bush administration created a false rationale to get public support for the invasion of Iraq. Over 4,000 Americans, and 100,000 Iraqis are dead because of this deception.
And you get pissed over hedging support over gay marriage.
There is absolutely no comparison between the two acts. Not one bit. But you stupid fuckers are freaked out over this yet still hold Bush and Cheney in high regard. Because they have an (R) after their names. And for NO other reason.
For that reason alone, I don't have one ounce of respect for you. Not one.
Yeah Bumble just shits on the Constitution and kills Americans fuck habeus corpus
Habeas.
TPM, told HB to start calling the Keystone pipeline the BS he started calling it, nothing HB says is original , ever.
Meathead
for the record I don't care if the leso's and queens marry.
hb laughs said...
He won't respond James."
Love proving you wrong so often HB, I did, now where is Jamesnewleaf.
Oh really Paul? Do you expect me to believe that? Let's say the news came out that the President knew exactly where a known terrorist was located. One deeply involved in active operations against the United States or her allies. But Obumble as you would be calling him, based on a legal technicality, that being he is an American citizen, refused to take him out and because of that Americans died in a terrorist attack.
You would be calling for his impeachment, as would most Republicans and perhaps even some Democrats. And you know it.
So don't try to bullshit a bullshitter. I know better.
k'putz, you are an idiot. The Obama Pipeline joke has been circulating for weeks.
You would be calling for his impeachment, as would most Republicans and perhaps even some Democrats. And you know it.
Fat man like it or not i have always delineated between Padilla, the panty bomber or the shoe bomber. I have always been consistant. You bend like gumby where American's rights begin and end, maybe not you're consistant in your hackishness Bumble good, W bad.
Hb smackewd you between the eyes with that one, Caliphate.
I think the national debt growth under Bush was ACTUALLY 4.9 trillion.
____________
Nice language granny Savage is using these days. Things must be REALLY getting to her.
Couldn't happen to a more deserving, etc....
Commensa said, rejoicing prematurely:
The approval ratings for the pathological liar has(sic) nosedived to 47% and is(sic) still falling.
Not on your beloved Rasmussen.
Obama is at
+52% approval
vs
-47% disapproval
A PLUS FIVE
Lincoln "played" the slaves and the slavery issue.
I see that clearly now.
What a horrible thing he did, pretending he was against slavery
yet willing to leave it alone in the south
when all the time he was just playing politics with the slaves and with the issue
and only when the political landscape showed him supporting emancipation would do more good than harm, only then did he issue the Proclamation.
Exactly as cowardly as what Obama did. Exactly.
Yeah, that's clearly what Lincoln did.
And Obama utilized the same cowardly tactic.
Yep..
Hb smackewd you between the eyes with that one, Caliphate.
Nah, unlike you pole smoker i don't change with the wind. I have inherent beliefs.
You can bet Obama has "something" up his sleeve...
...he'll do something, then run around the country, like the petulant child he is, and blame the Republicans.
Like I said before. I think he will use his power to inflict as much harm on the American public as possible so he can blame Republicans.
___________________
Right. If Obama "does" something, he'll be blamed for it. If, on the other hand, the situation of the sequester is what does it... Look out, GOP in public opinion!
(The GOP is already getting the blame.
Just let the economy really start souring or people really start losing jobs or medical services start being seriously cut back or...or...or....
Hell hath no fury like an electorate scorned.
They spoke in the last election.
Paul, Padilla is a US citizen, arrested in the US and held for years without charges or access to counsel. That was illegal as hell. The other two were foreign nationals who attempted to commit crimes, were arrested, charged and convicted under US law.
Not one of them is relevant in the discussion of the use of drones. You are just dodging the truth. As I said, if "Obumble" had not taken out people who although American citizens, were not in this country and were actively plotting to harm Americans, you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
You goddamn well know it.
Not one of them is relevant in the discussion of the use of drones. You are just dodging the truth. As I said, if "Obumble" had not taken out people who although American citizens, were not in this country and were actively plotting to harm Americans, you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
Does that include a 16 year old boy ?
There was no evidence he was involved in actively plotting to harm Americans.
His only crime was being the son of a terrorist.
If Bush did that you would be going ballistic. And you know it.
You are outraged at the splashing the water in the face of some real terrorist pieces of shit when Bush is president but give Obama a pass when he arbitrarily murders innocent civilians, including at least one American citizen.
On this issue your hypocrisy is particularly disgusting.
LMAO...
Guess who?
"@remeanie l tested at 750 with high comprehension too. Also blessed with an almost photographic memory. . Almost. Names & faces r a problem"
"@DreamOutLoud619 A gorgeous woman like you is alone? That's just not right! Lol The Chiefs got Alex Smith. AFC West gets more interesting
1:51am - 2 Mar 13"
"@Sobergirlprobz From what we can see, you are a very pretty girl!"
Savageette said...
LMAO...
Guess who?
You're right. He is a fat ugly puke.
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
Answer $ 4.756 Trillion (8 years)
Obama $ 5.733 Trillion (4 years)
Why did JNL want these numbers?
Ette said it was around 4.9 Trillion, and she was close.
James said the following non-sense.
"Nice language granny Savage is using these days. Things must be REALLY getting to her."
IF James you have a point about Obama racking up more National Debt in 4 years then Bush in 8 year do make it.
Thanks, I am still being nice to the left.
"Ette said it was around 4.9 Trillion, and she was close."
No, I didn't say it - pastor fraud said it.
He doesn't know how to post.
I was referring to Grandma Savage's fine language in post 2:14 PM yesterday, another sterling example of her commitment to the civility she professes.
_____________
And notice too that KD just keeps on and on and on "making it all about" Hb and me.
I guess we should feel honored, lol.
Crocodile tears being shed for a teenage boy killed along with a terrorist. Hmmmm.
________________
We shouldn't have killed Osama either I guess, since some other people got killed too.
I mean, the fact that he took out some 3,000 of our own people...that is no justification for killing some of the people who were with him.
You people have GOT to be aware of how pitiful and hypocritical your arguments are.
Hb has your number.
You asked a question, why did you want to know the Debt added by Bush?
OBAMA MAKING PUSH TO TAKE BACK CONGRESS
President Obama "is taking the most specific steps of his administration in an attempt to ensure the election of a Democratic-controlled Congress in two years," the Washington Post reports.
"Obama, fresh off his November reelection, began almost at once executing plans to win back the House in 2014, which he and his advisers believe will be crucial to the outcome of his second term and to his legacy as president. He is doing so BY TRYING TO ARTICULATE FOR THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE HIS OWN FEELINGS -- AN EXASPERATION WITH AN OPPOSITION PARTY THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA."
ECHO
THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA
ECHO
THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA
ECHO
THAT BLOCKS EVEN THE MOST POTENTIALLY POPULAR ELEMENTS OF HIS AGENDA
_________________________
And it will work. For the American people can understand that sort of exasperation and feel it themselves.
______________
For someone who was all worried about privacy we see who the hypocrite is.
I make no apologies for what I say, here, on Twitter or fb.
As to the snippets you provided. I have "known" the football fan for 2 years or so. She is a criminal defense attorney in San Diego and has an intelligence so far above yours it is hard to believe you are the same species.
One is a second year I believe, student at Penn State and also smart as hell. And btw twit, I do read 750 wpm or more, and have an almost photographic memory. Jealous?
The other girl, is sober and we engage in an occasional dialogue about that. She seems to be smart as hell, well adjusted and not angry at the world like you are. You should try it sometime.
As to looks.. since when do they matter in the greater scheme of things? The picture you saw is about 3 years old, taken by my daughter on the Space Needle in Seattle. Am i the most photogenic person on the planet? Far from it. But what I am not is a close minded old crone who hasn't had an original thought during her pathetic existence.
I follow over 1,500, with widely diverse points of view. From conservatives to liberals, on politics. On the sports I enjoy. There are also friends and family there. People I really know. Ditto on fb. Although I have a far shorter list of 'friends' on fb but it is a different type of media. On Twitter you just follow someone. And unless you are a dick, they don't block you. Which by the way, has never happened to me as far as I know.
I have engaged in twitter 'conversations' with a lot of people, including quite a list of well known public personalities. It's fun. And I make no apologies for what I say.
I am a lot of things you can't understand. But, in most every way, I am a far better person than you are or can aspire to be.
James the thing is this, you asked a debt question, two of answered it.
All you have to do is tell us why you want the Bush Debt data.
Simple task.
"I was referring to Grandma Savage's fine language in post 2:14 PM yesterday, another sterling example of her commitment to the civility she professes."
I withdrew that, if you only had a memory.
Which, obviously you don't - since you can't remember much of anything.
James, I read that Post piece on what Obama wants to do. It is a, shall we say, a long shot. But if he pulls it off, and I am not saying he will, he will go down as one of the great Presidents.
But for those who laugh at him and his ambitions on that. The list of people who have underestimated the man is long. These folks like to claim that he mislead people, that is the voters, claim they are "low information" voters taken in by a charlatan. That is an easy way to dodge the truth.
He was an unknown, young, inexperienced man with a funny name and on top of that is black. He has been elected by both electoral college and popular vote majorities twice. And a dispassionate observer would say he has quite a list of successes and some failures too. I think his biggest failure, based on a naive belief that the Republicans actually want the country to succeed, not just their party led him to try and work with them. They refused.
So, he is going to make a political gamble. He needs to take 17 seats away from the Republicans. Something like that has never been done.
I don't know whether he will succeed or fail, but I would not bet against him. Those that do have a long, long history of losing.
"For someone who was all worried about privacy we see who the hypocrite is.
I didn't post your name, address or anything else.
Idiot.
"I am a lot of things you can't understand. But, in most every way, I am a far better person than you are or can aspire to be."
lmao - suuuuure.
Hey - I notice you don't call women cunts, whores, sluts, ass-eating Indians, etc. on there...
...looks like you're just tryin' to pick up a few.
It won't work.
Now it's time for me to climb into bed with my beautiful wife, whom I love more than life itself and get some more sleep.
But I do have one more comment. James nailed it. For people who claim they dismiss us, don't care what we do or say, the troothers spend a hell of a lot of time and effort on us, don't they?
KD, by how much did the national debt grow in trillions of dollars during the eight years of Geo. W. Bush's presidency?
Answer $ 4.756 Trillion (8 years)
Obama $ 5.733 Trillion (4 years)
Notice that Obama sprinted by Bush and will continue to rack it up, by 2016 on the low side Obama will be at 8 plus Trillion.
Oh the twit.. what a piece of anger you are.. and a good example of what not to be as one ages.
"But I do have one more comment. James nailed it. For people who claim they dismiss us, don't care what we do or say, the troothers spend a hell of a lot of time and effort on us, don't they?"
Oh, it was no effort - no effort at all.
As to looks? No, they don't matter - if you have a decent personality, if you are a good person, if you aren't a pathological liar - so - yes - with you - looks do matter.
"Oh the twit.. what a piece of anger you are.. and a good example of what not to be as one ages."
Don't you mean whore, slut, gut-eater...ass licking Indian?
Oh, I'm not angry - I would be if you weren't so stupid - it's hard to be angry with someone as stupid as you, lol.
"And notice too that KD just keeps on and on and on "making it all about" Hb and me."
Since you two seem to ignore President Infanticide's lies...
...and continue to swoon over his - well - never mind.
Tell me, does your wife know about your man-crush on the President?
I follow over 1,500, with widely diverse points of view.
I've seen your list. I'd hardly call it diverse.
And btw twit, I do read 750 wpm or more, and have an almost photographic memory. Jealous?
And like a dumb Polaroid you don't comprehend a goddamn thing.
With a lack of Presidential Leadership and budget. This week we get the new crisis, continuing resolutions.
Remember when the US Had a budget and less then 500 billion a year deficits, think back to those better days.
I didn't post your name, address or anything else.
Idiot.
That's true Roger, she didn't post your name, twitter account, or facebook page.
You did.
Petulant James said...
We shouldn't have killed Osama either I guess, since some other people got killed too.
Really can you tell me how many innocent civilians were kill during the Bin Laden Raid?
Bin Laden's wives? No, they were unharmed.
Bin Laden's minor children? No, they were also unharmed.
So who were the innocent civilians that were kill?
Obama exploded the US Deficits and Debt. sprinting by Bush's little less then 500 billion mark, which was in my opinion way too much spending.
In the coming years Obama will add Trillions more, no amount of new taxes is going to change that fact.
I would like to see the President get into the mood to govern the US Government.
Can you imagine being on the USS Harry S. Truman
and be told by the sitting on his hands President that he can not find the Money to let you do your job?
"That's true Roger, she didn't post your name, twitter account, or facebook page.
You did."
Which shows how stupid he is. He throws himself a little hissy fit by posting under his real name...
...wow.
LOL!
His judgement sucks - it's like he's a teenager. We know who the brains are in THAT family.
So who were the innocent civilians that were kill?"
Sometimes we learn new things for our friends on the left, like, Obama is lowering the US National Debt in the next four years.
***We know who the brains are in THAT family - and he ain't one of 'em.
Ette and CS , JNL did not like the facts on his question about "W" debt vs Obama debt.
He found a need to ask the question, and unlike him and his best buddy HB, we answered his question(s).
JNL believed that for "most" of "W"'s term gasoline averaged above 3.00. The facts proved his belief wrong.
JNL said that no President has anything to do with the price of fuel. Then when show quotes from Obama/Polosi/Ried blaming Bush for the higher cost, well, that was then and now hold-harmless-Obama
Mich, if you're expecting the truth about Obama from any of the Obama swill swallowers on here...
...as they say, wish in one hand and...
I would have enjoyed a lively debate on the National Debt and why James found a need to address the question to me and then run from his question.
As for HB , he could have told us more about his "ton" of money from the sale of his rental and the around $30,000 in taxes which he voted to be imposed upon him.
But, that is asking to much.
An angry twit is an ugly thiing.
You should be the last person calling anybody ugly.
Fatboy
Obama, Hillary, Polosi, Shultz, Ried all blame Bush for gasoline.
Remarkable how it was Bush's fault for gas going up, but, now Obama has not hand in the price of fuel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQb_4hXLx2Q.
You want ugly - look in the mirror., lol.
That face would stop a clock.
When the President hyped the newest bestest his idea sequester cliff and not one of us fell off that cliff does the left find that kind of over hyping useful?
"Cliff" and "crisis" are not wise or smart management. In fact Managers are paid to reduce crisis and putting a business on the cliff, not driving to one and setting up a picnic.
Any one have a list of "loopholes" that this President wants to close?
“I’ll look at what’s happening right now, I wish I were there,” Mitt Romney said. “It kills me not to be there, not to be in the White House doing what needs to be done. The president is the leader of the nation. The president brings people together, does the deals, does the trades, knocks the heads together; the president leads. And – and I don’t see that kind of – of leadership happening right now”
Kills a lot of us knowing Romney would have been a better president than the liar-in-chief that now occupies the White House.
CS, are you still on Facebook?
My daughter uses hers all of the time - says she keeps in touch with the parents of other kids - I just don't know what I'd do with it.
Not sure I could fit it in, lol.
As it is - I'm texting with too many people now! Sometimes, I answer one niece, when it goes to another, lol.
Six nieces, five nephews, great nieces, great nephews...lordy.
CS, are you still on Facebook?
Yes, it's how I keep track of my nieces and nephews.
God knows they never write or call.
Other than that. I don't use it much.
Hmmm, that might be easier than texting - it's like bing! bing! bing! - all alll alllll day and into the night.
And then - "auntie! you're on the wrong line!" - lmao
What a crowd.
And poor poor Mitt. Had he a backbone, he might have won. He should have won. But like so many Republicans still rooted in the past as you all are, he was unable to persuade a sufficient number of voters that he has what it take to be President.
His unwillingness, or perhaps inability to take principled stands against anything, or as a matter of fact for anything doomed him to fail. We want our leaders to stand for something, even if we disagree with them on some aspects of those stands. But if they are not willing to stand for something, and Mitt Romney is unwilling to stand for anything, you usually will not win.
It was well documented that he had changed his stand on nearly every issue over the last twenty years or more. And each time he did so it looked like it was for political expediency. That is the major reason he was rejected.
I'll bet there are more than a few people this morning wondering why they voted for Barack Obama in the first place.
You assume that a lot of people who watch Fox "News" voted for Obama.
What I found most telling in the interview is that he believed until late that evening he was going to win. Even in a campaign to be President, he was in the Republican bubble. Every single independent poll with the exception of Gallup showed him losing. But they were so isolated from reality they were unable to see the world as it existed.
I see the same thing here every day so it wasn't just Mitt. And it will continue until the idea is crushed.
James....don't you feel that good ol' christian love offer by those 2??? I'm going to take you up on a name change as soon I think of something appropriate.....LOL...it is such an honor being held in such esteem by such 2 bit idjits...!!!
Nope, dumb fuck is just about right for him.
1:55 PM
Savageette said...
"and especially Savage and Commensa,
tell us exactly where the President is wrong on this."
You stupid FUCK - I support same-sex marriage.
Unlike the weasel in the WH - I've ALWAYS supported same-sex marriage, I've never lied about it, saying I've evolved.
2:14 PM
Commonsense said...
The again, dumb fuck would be just about right for Chicken-James also.
Hey UGA boy.....your school is #1 in my book.....chuckle be proud.
Records
The current record for the largest group streak was established at the University of Georgia, with 1,543 simultaneous streakers on March 7, 1974.[27]
"Yes, it's how I keep track of my nieces and nephews.
God knows they never write or call.
That is totally understandable....LOL
I'll bet there are more than a few people this morning wondering why they voted for Barack Obama in the first place."
Maybe at your cult, but not around here. I especially enjoyed Gov. Scott now thinking obamacare is the way to go. Then we have the UGA actuarial still posting the drivel that it will fail. Who to believe?
You assume that a lot of people who watch Fox "News" voted for Obama.
You attempt at diversion is rather lame Roger.
Scott, you based your assumption on your opinion. Not on any objective data.
Obama repeatedly said that the "sequester" was not his idea.
Dem Max Baucus said it was .
Woodward said it was.
And yet the President continued to lie.
Well, until, he put on his latest pair of flip-flop-big-plops.
"We put forth the design of" the sequestration, Sperling finally admits after a long back-and-forth. "
The We is the White House, not the Republicans.
Sure is easy for this President to lie, evade , mover, swim backwards, dance and deceive his followers.
After bringing up the issue of Bush Debt and finding out that in fact Obama sprinted by Bush in that area of adding more debt in 4 years then Bush did.
James has gone silent on his issue, no surprise.
Hope he has leaned .
More fake data the gw is a hoax. Come on sense, post something inane......LOL
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 3:34 PM GMT on March 01, 2013 +39
The historic summer of 2012 - 2013 is now in the books in Australia as the hottest summer on record, beating the previous mark set in 1997 - 1998 by more than 0.1°C. Australia also roasted through its hottest month on record this summer, with January 2013 topping out as Australia's warmest month since record keeping began in 1910. The oceans surrounding Australia were at their second warmest levels on record during January, contributing to the exceptional heat over the nation. The summer heat peaked during a remarkably long and widespread heatwave in late December and the first half of January, when fourteen of the 112 sites used by the Bureau of Meteorology for long-term monitoring had their hottest day on record. Sydney's 45.8°C (114.4°F) on January 18 and Hobart's 41.8°C (107.2°F) on January 4 were among the places which set new records. The highest temperature during the heatwave was 49.6°C (121.3°F) at Moomba in the far northeast of South Australia--Australia’s highest temperature since 1998. The extreme Australian heat helped push the average land temperature over the entire Southern Hemisphere to its warmest value on record during
Record heat without an El Niño: an unusual occurrence
What's notable about the new summer heat record is that is occurred during a “neutral” period in the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (there was neither a La Niña nor El Niño event present.) El Niño conditions add an extra natural bump to temperatures over Australia, and it is difficult to set all-time heat records unless there's an El Niño present. Before 2013, the hottest three summers on record in Australia occurred during El Niño years. Breaking an all-time hottest month and hottest summer record during a non-El Niño year is the type of event that would be difficult to have in Australia without a warming climate.
Dem Max Baucus said it was .
Woodward said it was"
So does my 92 year old mother so it must be true.
Chuckle
President Barack Obama raised anew the issue of cutting entitlements such as Medicare and Social Security"
Liberals what are the exact cuts he is proposing?
I do not know. Can you help me out?
Dayum catholix....even cardinals don't have enough blood to run 2 heads at the same time. They run the church just like republicons....sad.
A top cardinal who resigned last week amid sexual abuse allegations issued an apology today and said there have been times his sexual conduct "has fallen below the standards expected of me as a priest, archbishop and cardinal."
Cardinal Keith O'Brien, 74, the former Archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, resigned last week following published reports that he made unwanted sexual advances toward four priests in Scotland in the 1980s.
O'Brien has been accused of committing "inappropriate acts" in his relations with three priests and one former priest from the diocese of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, British newspaper The Observer reported last Sunday.
RELATED: Benedict XVI's Tenure as Pope Ends
The cardinal initially denied the claims, but said last week he would not participate in the conclave to choose the pope's successor because the allegations were a distraction. His immediate resignation was accepted Monday by Pope Benedict XVI.
O'Brien reversed course today, issuing a statement
"D" aka mini-troll
Liberals what are the exact cuts he is proposing?"
You continue to amaze me at you gross lack of any intellect. You'll get that answer right after boner describes the loopholes he will close. Oh wait, he took that back like the cheapass politician all the republicons are. Thanx for playing.
"D" aka mini-troll
Pure genius and not very original, even for you.
Chuckle....go dam a river.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt for President Mohammed Morsi's pledges of political and economic reforms by releasing $250 million in American aid to support the country's "future as a democracy."
Great we have zerO money for the USS Harry Truman but we do for Egypt.
Now that is fouled up.
I'm going to take you up on a name change as soon I think of something appropriate...
How about "Attention Whore" it has a nice ring and it's so you.
Egypt is trying to meet conditions to close on a $4.8 billion loan package from the International Monetary Fund. An agreement would unlock more of the $1 billion in U.S. assistance promised by President Barack Obama last year and set to begin flowing with Kerry's announcement.
"The United States can and wants to do more," Kerry said."
Great 250 million now, a Billion more later, and yet The CnC, refused to fund the Men and Woman of the USS Harry S. Truman.
Seems that we have a President that for got his primary job.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt
What a great idea......things seem realitively calm there and they get some jingle to help... Wonder who thought of doing this? Canter, Ryan, Rush???? But if you are any indication of the lunatic fringe, the blogosphere will be jumping shortly!!! LOL at you, again.
Post a Comment